Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Violence in the Movies Should Be Restricted free essay sample

Do you think a movie without any violence is less popular to capture audiences’ attention? There are a large number of movies come to the audiences everyday. For both movie producer and audiences’ benefit, violence in movies seems to be necessary. However, it is necessary for us to restrict violence in movies because teenage audiences will be easily influenced in bad ways; people will become apathetic in society while they have repeated exposure to violence in movies; this kind of movies can encourage people to have wrong lifestyles and values. Firstly, violence in movies will influence teenagers’ behavior and mental health. When we search â€Å"school shooting† on Google, there are 304,000,000 results within 0. 15 seconds. All of these tragedies happened in recent years after our media developed in a high speed. Such as the Winnenden school shooting in 2009. In this tragedy, Tim K. was a quiet boy who liked violence on computer games and movies. We will write a custom essay sample on Violence in the Movies Should Be Restricted or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page People may say violence in movies gives people a lot of visual enjoyment and make people relaxed after work and study. While most Hollywood famous action movie cannot be popular without the violence in it, historical movies cannot move people without any scene with blood. However, while violent movies are only for adults to feel relaxed, it is for these teenagers to find their role models in their life, and it has a big effect on teenagers’ behavior. Violence in movies not only encourages teenagers to do illegal things but also make those teenagers who are considering those violent crimes seem cool and makes them feel outstanding; on the other hand, teens are also imitating negative attitudes and behaviors when they feel accustomed to the violence in their real lives, ? and become scared of being victimized by others. Secondly, violence in movies will make people feel apathy to the society. Movie producers make violence to be a tool to draw audiences’ attention because people feel relaxed when they see these portrayals. There are lots of movies with violent previews to promote themselves; and in recent years, the success of this marketing tactic encourages thousands of moviemakers to increase violence in their movies. As this face shows, movie market cannot develop so rapidly without the violent elements. Lots of people may lose their jobs and movie market may lose its attraction while the violence in movies being restricted. Many people may think it is over reacting to restrict the violence in movies, because they think the violence in movies s only exist for art of movie or just fun. Unfortunately, the truth is people feel less sympathy to the victims of violence and felt more interested in the violent actions after they spend a lot of time watching violent movies. Thinking of school shootings, most of the murders were used to normal and quiet schoolboys, unfortunately, they get addicted to violence in video games, televisions and movies. Consequently, they do not notice differences between the vi olence in screen-based media and violence in real-life; they are apathetic to crimes in real life. Desensitization prevails like a disease in our society: â€Å"desensitization may also be inferred by examining related processed which are affected by desensitization. For example, when the desensitization occurs, the process of moral evaluation is disrupted because the individual does not perceive or respond to the cues that are necessary to initiate evaluative process. As a result, actions may be taken without consideration of their moral implications. Empathy and attitudes towards violence are important components of the process of moral evaluation, which may be affected by exposure to violence in real life or in the media† (Funk, Baldacci, Pasold and Baumgardner, 2004, p. 25). People are used to seeing violence; therefore, they will not response immediately when they physically face these kinds of situations; what is worse, they may just standby and ignore it. Imagine a society without any care; no one gives a hand to people in trouble, and that is the last thing we want to see. Lastly, violence in movies will influence people’s value. People become more frustrated than before, take drugs, abuse their children, alcoholics and many other social problems. Somehow, these stresses come from people’s wrong values about the wealth and celebrity. It is good for people to have ambitious while they want to be successful, sometimes, people will easily lose their determination without a strong mind. But nowadays, people are all eager to be the winner, while these kind values gradually change people’s mind, individuals become overly strict to themselves, giving too much pressure to themselves and easily get hurt from failures. One of the worst things about the violence in movies mentioned by Crisis Connection (2011) is that criminals are still at large after they break the law for most time. From what happened in movies, people learn to solve conflicts by violence and consider that the violent behavior is cool. Then, people’s values of justice are affected by movies, people considers Superman and criminals in Fast both as role models, whereas the second one is much easier to imitate. Almost half of all violent behavior on media without showing the hurt on victims, and there is only sixteen percent of the media products show the negative long-term consequence from criminal to victims, so that audiences will easily think the violence is nothing hurt but the short cut to success Violence in movies should be restricted. Violence in movies makes people violent and feels apathetic to other people’s lives and toward the whole society. All in all, violence in movies may attract bigger audiences, but the harms done are larger than any benefit. Reducing violence in movies is necessary.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Alessandro Volta - Inventor of the Voltaic Pile

Alessandro Volta - Inventor of the Voltaic Pile In 1800, Alessandro Volta of Italy built the voltaic pile and discovered the first practical method of generating electricity. Count Volta also made discoveries in electrostatics, meteorology and pneumatics. His most famous invention, however, is the first battery. Alessandro Volta - Background Alessandro Volta was born in Como, Italy in 1745. In 1774, he was appointed as professor of physics at the Royal School in Como. While at the Royal School, Alessandro Volta designed his first invention the electrophorus in 1774, a device that produced static electricity. For years at Como, he studied and experimented with atmospheric electricity by igniting static sparks. In 1779, Alessandro Volta was appointed professor of physics at the University of Pavia and it was while there that he invented his most famous invention, the voltaic pile. Alessandro Volta - Voltaic Pile Constructed of alternating discs of zinc and copper, with pieces of cardboard soaked in brine between the metals, the voltaic pile produced electrical current. The metallic conducting arc was used to carry the electricity over a greater distance. Alessandro Voltas voltaic pile was the first battery that produced a reliable, steady current of electricity. Alessandro Volta - Luigi Galvani One contemporary of Alessandro Volta was Luigi Galvani, in fact, it was Voltas disagreement with Galvanis theory of galvanic responses (animal tissue contained a form of electricity) that led Volta to build the voltaic pile to prove that electricity did not come from the animal tissue but was generated by the contact of different metals, brass and iron, in a moist environment. Ironically, both scientists were right. Named In Honor of Alessandro Volta Volt - The unit of electromotive force, or difference of potential, which will cause a current of one ampere to flow through a resistance of one ohm. Named for Italian physicist Alessandro Volta.Photovoltaic - Photovoltaic are systems that convert light energy into electricity. The term photo is a stem from the Greek phos, which means light. Volt is named for Alessandro Volta, a pioneer in the study of electricity.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

The effects of poverty in the development of children's thinking Research Paper

The effects of poverty in the development of children's thinking related to mathematics - Research Paper Example Children from economically challenged families appear to have a more difficult time in learning mathematical skills than do children from families with secure finances. While the body of research that exists on the topic has tended to focus on ethnicity as a component to the achievement gaps that are appreciated where learning mathematics is involved, it is more clearly evident that economic disparities create achievement gaps where expectations are not being met. Economic power asserts a certain level or propriety where knowledge is concerned, but this can be used where context is shown to be essential in learning mathematical knowledge. Putting math into context with real life situations appears to increase the ability to effectively use mathematical knowledge. Socialization appears to be the key to how learning is accomplished and learning math is affected when earlier socialization towards learning intangible concepts has not been established. The effect of economics on the gaps in achievement as observed between low and high income families is more likely due to the differences in socialization towards learning rather than in a disparity in income. There is a belief based upon research that children from African American and Latin ethnic origins, as well as those from low socio-economic areas have lowered scores on standardized tests than to those from Caucasian ethnic origins and with a higher level of socio-economic advantages. According to Flores (2007), â€Å"Specifically, data show that African American, Latino, and low-income students are less likely to have access to experienced and qualified teachers, more likely to face low expectations, and less likely to receive equitable per student funding â€Å" (p. 29). ... In the study done by Flores (2007) who also focuses on socio-economic status, the statistics concerned with ethnicity is also considered. Flores (2007) presents data concerning standardized tests still shows a disparity in regard to ethnicity. In African American students, 91% have not met the mathematics proficiencies expected by the eighth grade. For Latino students that figure is 87%. Asian American students, on the other hand, show that 53% are not meeting mathematical expectations and Caucasian students are at 63%. The first notable information from these statistics is that over half of all students are not meeting mathematical achievement expectations by grade eight. The discussion, when focused on socio-economic backgrounds, shows that while 38% of children from financially secure homes meet expectations in mathematics on standardized tests, only 13% of children from economically insecure families meet those expectations (Flores, 2007). Economic disparities also lead to cultur al disparities with families having members with minds that have been trained academically have a much easier time in transferring that type of learning discipline onto their children. As poverty and academic achievement are related, families in lower socio-economic levels are less likely to have achieved higher education; therefore their children are not taught how to pursue education nor to have an admiration for economic achievement. One of the other misconceptions where research has focused on culture and ethnic issues where learning is concerned is that there has been an association with culture and ethnicity. According to work done by Nasir and Hand